PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRC vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRC vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRC achieves a 78.10% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GRC has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 14.19%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.10% annualized return.


GRC

1D
2.14%
1M
12.41%
YTD
78.10%
6M
71.53%
1Y
133.46%
3Y*
48.08%
5Y*
21.07%
10Y*
14.19%

ABBV

1D
1.32%
1M
9.22%
YTD
1.30%
6M
3.65%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
18.94%
10Y*
19.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRC vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp Company
78.10%28.24%8.87%42.15%-41.17%39.71%-11.90%17.64%11.75%2.49%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
1.30%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GRC and ABBV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRC:

$2.23B

ABBV:

$403.99B

EPS

GRC:

$2.23

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

GRC:

37.88

ABBV:

110.96

PS Ratio

GRC:

3.20

ABBV:

6.43

PB Ratio

GRC:

2.59

ABBV:

14.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRC:

$695.03M

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRC:

$210.01M

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRC:

$118.94M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRC vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRC
GRC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRC vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRCABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.18

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.33

1.29

+8.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.85

2.88

+25.97

GRC vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRC Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRC and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRC vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRC drawdown since its inception was -67.23%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRC and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRCABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.23%

-45.09%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.39%

-17.32%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.87%

-20.74%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.26%

-21.92%

-27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.26%

-45.09%

-4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.60%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-10.71%

-6.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

7.75%

-3.08%

Volatility

GRC vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 6.10%. This indicates that GRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRCABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

6.10%

+4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.10%

17.85%

+10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.75%

24.31%

+10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.83%

22.89%

+7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.02%

25.73%

+8.29%

Dividends

GRC vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

GRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than ABBV's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.96%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp Company
0.89%1.56%1.91%1.98%2.67%1.43%1.82%1.47%7.74%1.51%1.39%1.52%

Financials

GRC vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gorman-Rupp Company and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
176.59M
15.00B
(GRC) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRC vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Gorman-Rupp Company and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
32.5%
83.5%
Portfolio components
GRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 57.36M and revenue of 176.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

GRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 27.48M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

GRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRC and ABBV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRC has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to ABBV (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRC dropped -67.23% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRC and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer