GQRPX vs. ACWI
GQRPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GQRPX returned 9.70%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for ACWI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQRPX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQRPX achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.
GQRPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.60% | 0.67% | 19.98% | 19.56% | -3.77% | 16.94% | 14.55% | 12.70% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQRPX and ACWI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GQRPX and ACWI has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQRPX vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
GQRPX
ACWI
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQRPX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 2.29 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 3.17 | -1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.41 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.01 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 13.53 | -10.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQRPX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.29 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.71 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.43 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQRPX drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRPX and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQRPX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -56.00% | +27.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.37% | -9.73% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | -16.55% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -26.42% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -0.83% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -8.61% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.16% | +0.42% |
Volatility
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) is 2.70%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that GQRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQRPX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 3.93% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.94% | 10.29% | -3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.03% | 12.78% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 16.05% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.11% | +0.16% |
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQRPX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQRPX vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
GQRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.06% | 7.60% | 6.35% | 1.22% | 2.93% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQRPX and ACWI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to GQRPX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRPX dropped -28.88% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQRPX and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer