PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQRE vs. ERET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQRE vs. ERET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQRE achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than ERET's 5.79% return.


GQRE

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
7.34%
6M
7.63%
1Y
11.71%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
3.78%

ERET

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
5.79%
6M
5.65%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQRE vs. ERET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
7.34%8.27%6.09%9.21%-0.84%
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
5.79%10.26%0.60%10.25%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GQRE and ERET is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022

0.96

The correlation between GQRE and ERET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GQRE vs. ERET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GQRE
ERET

Real Estate

87.9%
99.7%

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
0.0%

Technology

0.8%
0.2%

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

GQRE
87.9%
ERET
99.7%

Financial Services

GQRE
2.0%
ERET

-

Consumer Cyclical

GQRE
1.0%
ERET
0.0%

Technology

GQRE
0.8%
ERET
0.2%

Healthcare

GQRE
0.6%
ERET

-

Consumer Defensive

GQRE
0.5%
ERET

-

Utilities

GQRE
0.5%
ERET

-

Communication Services

GQRE
0.5%
ERET

-

Industrials

GQRE
0.2%
ERET

-

Basic Materials

GQRE
0.0%
ERET

-

Energy

GQRE

-

ERET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQRE vs. ERET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQRE
GQRE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GQRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ERET
ERET Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQRE vs. ERET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQREERETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.02

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

3.82

+0.60

GQRE vs. ERET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the ERET Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQRE and ERET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQREERETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.49

-0.19

Drawdowns

GQRE vs. ERET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than ERET's maximum drawdown of -20.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and ERET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQREERETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-20.30%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-10.47%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-17.61%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-4.68%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-5.83%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.78%

-0.12%

Volatility

GQRE vs. ERET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is 3.53%, while Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that GQRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQREERETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.96%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

9.20%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

12.04%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

15.77%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

15.77%

+1.89%

GQRE vs. ERET - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ERET's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQRE vs. ERET - Dividend Comparison

GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than ERET's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
3.59%3.79%4.26%3.67%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
4.36%4.75%3.77%2.91%2.56%2.36%2.05%4.29%3.22%1.97%4.16%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GQRE and ERET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ERET has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to GQRE (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs ERET's -20.30%.

On 3-year performance, GQRE leads with 10.30% vs 8.67% for ERET. On fees, ERET is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERET is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GQRE.

GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 3.59% for ERET.

GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR), while ERET tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.30% for ERET.

GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQRE and ERET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer