GQRE vs. ERET
GQRE (FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund) and ERET (Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - GQRE tracks the Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR) while ERET tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GQRE returned 10.30%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for ERET. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GQRE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ERET.
Performance
GQRE vs. ERET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQRE achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than ERET's 5.79% return.
GQRE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
ERET
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 10.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQRE vs. ERET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 7.34% | 8.27% | 6.09% | 9.21% | -0.84% |
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF | 5.79% | 10.26% | 0.60% | 10.25% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQRE and ERET is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GQRE and ERET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
GQRE vs. ERET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GQRE
ERET
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
GQRE
ERET
Financial Services
GQRE
ERET
-
Consumer Cyclical
GQRE
ERET
Technology
GQRE
ERET
Healthcare
GQRE
ERET
-
Consumer Defensive
GQRE
ERET
-
Utilities
GQRE
ERET
-
Communication Services
GQRE
ERET
-
Industrials
GQRE
ERET
-
Basic Materials
GQRE
ERET
-
Energy
GQRE
-
ERET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQRE vs. ERET — Risk / Return Rank
GQRE
ERET
GQRE vs. ERET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQRE | ERET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 3.82 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQRE | ERET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.88 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
GQRE vs. ERET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than ERET's maximum drawdown of -20.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and ERET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQRE | ERET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -20.30% | -21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -10.47% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.17% | -17.61% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.43% | -4.68% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -5.83% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.78% | -0.12% |
Volatility
GQRE vs. ERET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is 3.53%, while Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that GQRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQRE | ERET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 3.96% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 9.20% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 12.04% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 15.77% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 15.77% | +1.89% |
GQRE vs. ERET - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ERET's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQRE vs. ERET - Dividend Comparison
GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than ERET's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF | 3.59% | 3.79% | 4.26% | 3.67% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 4.36% | 4.75% | 3.77% | 2.91% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 4.29% | 3.22% | 1.97% | 4.16% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GQRE and ERET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ERET has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to GQRE (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs ERET's -20.30%.
On 3-year performance, GQRE leads with 10.30% vs 8.67% for ERET. On fees, ERET is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERET is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GQRE.
GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 3.59% for ERET.
GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR), while ERET tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.30% for ERET.
GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQRE and ERET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer