GQI vs. ZHDG
GQI (Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF) and ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GQI returned 23.37% vs 18.31% for ZHDG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQI charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ZHDG.
Performance
GQI vs. ZHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQI achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than ZHDG's 5.12% return.
GQI
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHDG
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQI vs. ZHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF | 8.04% | 15.36% | 15.99% | 0.68% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 5.12% | 14.34% | 18.02% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQI and ZHDG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GQI and ZHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
GQI vs. ZHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GQI
ZHDG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GQI
ZHDG
Consumer Cyclical
GQI
ZHDG
Communication Services
GQI
ZHDG
Financial Services
GQI
ZHDG
Industrials
GQI
ZHDG
Healthcare
GQI
ZHDG
Consumer Defensive
GQI
ZHDG
Energy
GQI
ZHDG
Utilities
GQI
ZHDG
Basic Materials
GQI
ZHDG
Real Estate
GQI
ZHDG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQI vs. ZHDG — Risk / Return Rank
GQI
ZHDG
GQI vs. ZHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQI | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.15 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | 8.97 | +9.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQI | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.79 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.51 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
GQI vs. ZHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQI drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, smaller than the maximum ZHDG drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQI and ZHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQI | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -23.27% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -8.56% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.60% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -8.16% | +6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 2.05% | -0.78% |
Volatility
GQI vs. ZHDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) is 1.71%, while ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that GQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQI | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 2.80% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.93% | 8.06% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 10.27% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 11.75% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 11.75% | +1.38% |
GQI vs. ZHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQI has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHDG's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQI vs. ZHDG - Dividend Comparison
GQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than ZHDG's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF | 8.74% | 8.97% | 7.77% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 3.58% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQI and ZHDG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZHDG has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to GQI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQI dropped -16.56% vs ZHDG's -23.27%.
On 1-year performance, GQI leads with 23.37% vs 18.31% for ZHDG. On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, GQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GQI has performed better with a 23.37% return vs 18.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ZHDG.
GQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.
They also come from different issuers: Natixis and ZEGA. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GQI and 0.98% for ZHDG.
GQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQI and ZHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer