GQI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GQI (Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GQI returned 23.37% vs 11.44% for OMAH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQI charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

GQI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQI achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.

GQI

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.04%	16.26%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GQI and OMAH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.58

The correlation between GQI and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GQI vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GQI	OMAH
Technology	35.5%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	4.1%
Communication Services	11.4%	9.8%
Financial Services	10.3%	38.9%
Industrials	8.9%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	16.2%
Energy	5.3%	10.5%
Utilities	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

GQI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQI

GQI Risk / Return Rank: 77
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.43	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.02	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	3.82	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.50	9.48	+9.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GQI vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQI and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.43	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	0.70	+0.56

Drawdowns

GQI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQI drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-11.83%	-4.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-3.00%	-3.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-2.65%	+2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-1.26%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	1.21%	+0.06%

Volatility

GQI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) is 1.71%, while VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that GQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	1.93%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	5.49%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.52%	8.05%	+1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	13.21%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.13%	13.21%	-0.08%

GQI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQI has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

GQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.74%	8.97%	7.77%	0.31%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQI and OMAH in my portfolio?

GQI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQI or OMAH?

OMAH has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to GQI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQI dropped -16.56% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, GQI or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, GQI leads with 23.37% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, GQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GQI or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, GQI has performed better with a 23.37% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQI or OMAH?

GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQI or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 8.74% for GQI.

What is the main difference between GQI and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Natixis and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GQI and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.