GQI vs. DIVO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO).

GQI and DIVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GQI is an actively managed fund by Natixis. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. DIVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Dec 13, 2016.

Performance

GQI vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GQI vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	-1.51%	15.36%	15.99%	0.68%
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	2.19%	17.40%	16.22%	1.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQI achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 2.19% return.

GQI

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVO

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 5.30%
• 1Y: 17.84%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 11.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQI vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQI has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.

DIVO

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

GQI

Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF

Return for Risk

GQI vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQI

GQI Risk / Return Rank: 69
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

DIVO

DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 76
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQI vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQI	DIVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.36	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.99	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.92	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	9.07	+0.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GQI vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQI and DIVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQI	DIVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	1.36	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.83	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between GQI and DIVO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GQI vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

GQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.80%, more than DIVO's 6.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	9.80%	8.97%	7.77%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	6.48%	6.44%	4.70%	4.67%	4.76%	4.79%	4.91%	8.16%	5.27%	3.83%

Drawdowns

GQI vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQI drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQI and DIVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQI	DIVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-30.04%	+13.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.39%	-9.21%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.74%	-3.96%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-2.62%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.95%	-0.06%

Volatility

GQI vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 3.58%. This indicates that GQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQI	DIVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	3.58%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	7.01%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.55%	13.13%	+2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.46%	11.93%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.46%	14.93%	-1.47%