GQI vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GQI (Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQI charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

GQI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQI achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 336.58% return.

GQI

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -5.75%
• 1M: 108.38%
• YTD: 336.58%
• 6M: 222.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.41%	4.26%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	336.58%	-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GQI and ARMW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.48

GQI vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GQI	ARMW
Technology	35.5%	36.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	-
Communication Services	11.4%	-
Financial Services	10.3%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	-
Energy	5.3%	-
Utilities	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

GQI vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQI

GQI Risk / Return Rank: 80
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.99	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	4.33	-3.05

Drawdowns

GQI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQI drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQI and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQI	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-48.47%	+31.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.75%	+5.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-26.42%	+24.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQI	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.51%	88.57%	-79.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	88.57%	-75.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	88.57%	-75.45%

GQI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQI has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

GQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, less than ARMW's 16.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	16.13%	16.38%	0.00%	0.00%
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.71%	8.97%	7.77%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQI and ARMW in my portfolio?

GQI and ARMW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GQI or ARMW?

On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQI or ARMW?

GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQI or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 8.71% for GQI.

What is the main difference between GQI and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GQI and 0.99% for ARMW.