GQGU vs. QARP

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GQGU is actively managed, while QARP is passively managed. Over the past year, GQGU returned 5.06% vs 23.49% for QARP. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.

Performance

GQGU vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.07% return.

GQGU

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 4.36%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QARP

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 2.08%
• 6M: 9.01%
• YTD: 12.07%
• 1Y: 23.49%
• 3Y*: 16.84%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	5.66%	-1.12%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	12.07%	9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and QARP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

GQGU vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQGU

GQGU Risk / Return Rank: 18
GQGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GQGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GQGU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
GQGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
GQGU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 85
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGU vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQGU	QARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	2.23	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	3.15	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.40	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	3.25	-2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.45	14.45	-13.00

GQGU vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQGU and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and QARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQGU	QARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-35.44%	+27.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.41%	-7.26%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-0.63%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-4.39%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	1.63%	+1.87%

Volatility

GQGU vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.84%. This indicates that GQGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQGU	QARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	2.84%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	8.25%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	10.60%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.66%	15.54%	-4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.66%	19.55%	-8.89%

GQGU vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQGU vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than QARP's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.96%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.03%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQGU and QARP in my portfolio?

GQGU and QARP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQGU or QARP?

GQGU has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to QARP (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQGU dropped -8.41% vs QARP's -35.44%.

Which ETF is better, GQGU or QARP?

On 1-year performance, QARP leads with 23.49% vs 5.06% for GQGU. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GQGU or QARP?

Over the 1-year period, QARP has performed better with a 23.49% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQGU or QARP?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQGU or QARP?

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.96% for GQGU.

What is the main difference between GQGU and QARP?

They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.19% for QARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.