PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GQGU vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GQGU vs. BIBL

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL).

GQGU and BIBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025. BIBL is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017.

Performance

GQGU vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GQGU vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF		9.00%-1.14%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF		6.48%8.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than BIBL's 6.48% return.

GQGU

1D
0.75%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
9.00%
6M
8.01%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

BIBL

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
6.48%
6M
7.18%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GQG US Equity ETF

Inspire 100 ETF

Often compared with GQGU:
GQGU vs. SCHGGQGU vs. BBUSGQGU vs. GPIQGQGU vs. QQQMGQGU vs. ACWIGQGU vs. VUGGQGU vs. TOPT
Often compared with BIBL:
BIBL vs. BLESBIBL vs. GLRYBIBL vs. TPHDBIBL vs. FDLSBIBL vs. KCEBIBL vs. JMOMBIBL vs. FPHAX

GQGU vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF

Return for Risk

GQGU vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GQGU
BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGU vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GQGU vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GQGUBIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

1.20

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.44

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.54

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and BIBL is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GQGU vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than BIBL's 1.11% yield.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF		0.93%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF		1.11%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and BIBL.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GQGUBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-36.12%

+29.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-8.94%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-30.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-4.62%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-7.16%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.96%

—

Volatility

GQGU vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GQGUBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.75%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

12.28%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

20.39%

-10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.67%

19.44%

-9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.67%

21.14%

-11.47%