PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQGIX vs. FHKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQGIX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGIX achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than FHKFX's 33.82% return.


GQGIX

1D
-1.25%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.53%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*

FHKFX

1D
-1.01%
1M
6.51%
YTD
33.82%
6M
36.68%
1Y
64.66%
3Y*
27.55%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GQGIX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares
6.35%9.92%6.19%28.81%-20.85%-2.37%33.98%21.08%-7.59%
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
33.82%38.51%5.42%12.10%-24.50%-4.15%17.85%9.64%-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGIX and FHKFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.80

The correlation between GQGIX and FHKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQGIX vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQGIX
GQGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GQGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GQGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FHKFX
FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQGIX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQGIXFHKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.63

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

5.35

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

20.24

-14.86

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the FHKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQGIX and FHKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQGIXFHKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

3.52

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.42

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.43

+0.13

Drawdowns

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum FHKFX drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGIX and FHKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQGIXFHKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-45.47%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-12.54%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-16.71%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-42.10%

+12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-1.01%

-3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-17.22%

+5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.31%

-0.61%

Volatility

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQGIX) is 3.48%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that GQGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQGIXFHKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

7.87%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

16.31%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

19.05%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.71%

19.08%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

19.69%

-3.76%

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQGIX vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison

GQGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than FHKFX's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
1.78%2.38%2.86%2.43%2.56%3.46%1.38%2.28%0.42%0.00%
GQGIX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares
2.00%2.13%1.70%2.71%5.67%3.91%0.24%1.16%0.81%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQGIX and FHKFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHKFX has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to GQGIX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQGIX dropped -33.50% vs FHKFX's -45.47%.

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQGIX and FHKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer