GQFPX vs. MSFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX).
GQFPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021. MSFAX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2001.
Performance
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 9.67% | 19.29% | 4.81% | 15.09% | -1.13% | 5.03% |
MSFAX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio | -13.49% | -11.65% | 8.94% | 16.41% | -17.26% | 11.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQFPX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than MSFAX's -13.49% return.
GQFPX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFAX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- -13.49%
- 6M
- -26.38%
- 1Y
- -25.95%
- 3Y*
- -3.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQFPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFAX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GQFPX vs. MSFAX — Risk / Return Rank
GQFPX
MSFAX
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQFPX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | -1.33 | +2.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | -1.68 | +3.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.72 | +0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | -0.86 | +2.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | -2.10 | +11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQFPX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | -1.33 | +2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GQFPX and MSFAX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Dividend Comparison
GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, while MSFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 4.85% | 5.32% | 3.71% | 3.69% | 5.18% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFAX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.85% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 2.75% | 3.48% | 8.23% | 5.76% | 3.72% | 3.11% | 4.75% |
Drawdowns
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQFPX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, smaller than the maximum MSFAX drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQFPX and MSFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQFPX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.95% | -43.81% | +26.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.60% | -30.00% | +20.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -33.13% | +29.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -5.69% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 12.30% | -10.23% |
Volatility
GQFPX vs. MSFAX - Volatility Comparison
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) have volatilities of 3.98% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GQFPX | MSFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.10% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 15.72% | -8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 19.24% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 16.91% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 16.90% | -4.01% |