PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQETX vs. GMWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQETX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than GMWAX's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GQETX has outperformed GMWAX with an annualized return of 16.18%, while GMWAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.62% annualized return.


GQETX

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.19%
YTD
5.77%
6M
6.66%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
16.18%

GMWAX

1D
0.45%
1M
5.25%
YTD
12.73%
6M
14.26%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
5.77%19.61%17.76%28.94%-15.33%31.67%18.33%31.77%0.50%29.11%
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
12.73%23.40%0.23%16.17%-12.71%7.03%6.15%17.70%-7.21%15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GQETX and GMWAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.84

The correlation between GQETX and GMWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQETX vs. GMWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQETX
GQETX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GQETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQETX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GQETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQETX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

GMWAX
GMWAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQETXGMWAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

3.41

-1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

4.82

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.65

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

4.37

-2.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

16.79

-9.66

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the GMWAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQETX and GMWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQETXGMWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.41

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.67

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.74

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.32

+0.39

Drawdowns

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQETX drawdown since its inception was -39.99%, roughly equal to the maximum GMWAX drawdown of -41.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQETX and GMWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQETXGMWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.99%

-41.69%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-6.87%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-13.17%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-22.47%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-25.12%

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-11.23%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

1.78%

+1.44%

Volatility

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) is 2.81%, while GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that GQETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQETXGMWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.04%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

6.92%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

8.80%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

10.02%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

10.35%

+6.72%

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQETX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GMWAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQETX vs. GMWAX - Dividend Comparison

GQETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than GMWAX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
4.33%4.88%0.14%5.47%3.78%6.16%4.00%4.00%3.77%2.50%2.25%3.13%
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
10.55%11.16%3.91%3.43%11.85%10.19%13.61%8.08%21.66%8.10%3.56%17.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQETX and GMWAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMWAX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to GQETX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQETX dropped -39.99% vs GMWAX's -41.69%.

GMWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQETX and GMWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer