PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPSCX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GPSCX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRTGX

1D
0.86%
1M
5.85%
YTD
18.46%
6M
16.83%
1Y
39.45%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPSCX
Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund
0.00%-13.27%24.26%7.27%-37.24%-7.96%37.80%38.52%-8.92%37.59%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.46%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSCX and VRTGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.91

The correlation between GPSCX and VRTGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPSCX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPSCX

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPSCXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPSCXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

Volatility

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPSCXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSCX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPSCX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

GPSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPSCX
Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund
0.00%0.48%0.00%0.00%11.02%24.10%22.25%11.69%33.03%5.00%0.00%40.41%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GPSCX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPSCX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer