PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GPSA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GPSA.L is traded in GBP, while XMVU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMVU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPSA.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than XMVU.L's 2.55% return.


GPSA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
4.94%
YTD
10.42%
6M
9.60%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*

XMVU.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.21%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GPSA.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.42%9.72%28.95%23.60%-11.94%29.93%17.87%1.19%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
2.52%0.25%17.70%4.30%1.22%22.78%1.32%-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSA.L and XMVU.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between GPSA.L and XMVU.L has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPSA.L
XMVU.L

Technology

40.6%
29.6%

Communication Services

11.7%
6.0%

Financial Services

11.7%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
6.4%

Healthcare

9.0%
12.7%

Industrials

7.3%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
10.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Energy

1.7%
3.5%

Utilities

1.2%
7.6%

Technology

GPSA.L
40.6%
XMVU.L
29.6%

Communication Services

GPSA.L
11.7%
XMVU.L
6.0%

Financial Services

GPSA.L
11.7%
XMVU.L
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GPSA.L
10.6%
XMVU.L
6.4%

Healthcare

GPSA.L
9.0%
XMVU.L
12.7%

Industrials

GPSA.L
7.3%
XMVU.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

GPSA.L
2.5%
XMVU.L
10.0%

Real Estate

GPSA.L
2.0%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

GPSA.L
1.8%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Energy

GPSA.L
1.7%
XMVU.L
3.5%

Utilities

GPSA.L
1.2%
XMVU.L
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPSA.L
GPSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GPSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVU.L
XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GPSA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPSA.LXMVU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.10

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

1.05

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

2.53

+9.14

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPSA.L and XMVU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPSA.LXMVU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

0.56

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.69

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.65

+0.31

Drawdowns

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPSA.L drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, smaller than the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -24.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSA.L and XMVU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPSA.LXMVU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.14%

-24.94%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-5.07%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.33%

-11.48%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-11.48%

-10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.86%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-4.01%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.11%

+0.44%

Volatility

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GPSA.L) is 2.87%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that GPSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPSA.LXMVU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.31%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

7.14%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

9.47%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

12.13%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

13.83%

+2.87%

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GPSA.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison

GPSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GPSA.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
1.18%1.24%1.31%1.33%1.82%1.27%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPSA.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GPSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GPSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMVU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GPSA.L and 0.20% for XMVU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPSA.L and XMVU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer