GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GPSA.L (iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLXU.L (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and Franklin Templeton respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GPSA.L returned 15.27%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for FLXU.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GPSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXU.L.

Performance

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GPSA.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPSA.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLXU.L's 12.19% return.

GPSA.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.94%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 9.60%
• 1Y: 29.51%
• 3Y*: 20.13%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: —

FLXU.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GPSA.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	10.42%	9.72%	28.95%	23.60%	-11.94%	29.93%	17.87%	1.19%
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF	12.19%	13.10%	12.49%	8.52%	2.19%	28.57%	5.69%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSA.L and FLXU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019	0.88

The correlation between GPSA.L and FLXU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPSA.L	FLXU.L
Technology	40.6%	34.3%
Communication Services	11.7%	12.2%
Financial Services	11.7%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	11.5%
Healthcare	9.0%	10.5%
Industrials	7.3%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%
Energy	1.7%	1.0%
Utilities	1.2%	1.6%

Return for Risk

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPSA.L

GPSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
GPSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GPSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GPSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GPSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GPSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FLXU.L

FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GPSA.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPSA.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.72	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.77	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.50	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	5.18	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.67	18.83	-7.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPSA.L and FLXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPSA.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.72	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	1.02	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.89	+0.07

Drawdowns

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPSA.L drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, smaller than the maximum FLXU.L drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSA.L and FLXU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPSA.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.14%	-24.72%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-5.90%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.33%	-20.13%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	-20.13%	-2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.02%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-3.01%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	1.63%	+0.92%

Volatility

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GPSA.L) is 2.87%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that GPSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPSA.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	3.47%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	8.19%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.45%	11.24%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	13.07%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	14.93%	+1.77%

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GPSA.L vs. FLXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GPSA.L nor FLXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPSA.L and FLXU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GPSA.L and FLXU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GPSA.L or FLXU.L?

On fees, GPSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPSA.L or FLXU.L?

GPSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXU.L.

What is the main difference between GPSA.L and FLXU.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GPSA.L and 0.25% for FLXU.L.