PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPRF vs. XLEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPRF vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 20.42% return.


GPRF

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.14%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.66%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLEI

1D
1.05%
1M
1.40%
YTD
20.42%
6M
20.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPRF vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and XLEI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.21

GPRF vs. XLEI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPRF
XLEI

Financial Services

20.6%
100.3%

Real Estate

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

GPRF
20.6%
XLEI
100.3%

Real Estate

GPRF
3.4%
XLEI

-

Utilities

GPRF
2.5%
XLEI

-

Consumer Cyclical

GPRF
0.9%
XLEI

-

Communication Services

GPRF
0.5%
XLEI

-

Industrials

GPRF
0.4%
XLEI

-

Basic Materials

GPRF

-

XLEI

-

Consumer Defensive

GPRF

-

XLEI

-

Energy

GPRF

-

XLEI

-

Healthcare

GPRF

-

XLEI

-

Technology

GPRF

-

XLEI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPRF vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRF
GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XLEI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRF vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPRFXLEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

GPRF vs. XLEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPRFXLEIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

2.65

-1.28

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum XLEI drawdown of -7.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and XLEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPRFXLEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-7.98%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.97%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-1.52%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

GPRF vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPRFXLEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

13.16%

-9.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.94%

13.16%

-9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

13.16%

-9.22%

GPRF vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPRF vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than XLEI's 16.59% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPRF and XLEI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GPRF.

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 5.65% for GPRF.

GPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XLEI is Energy Equities. GPRF tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.35% for XLEI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPRF and XLEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer