GPRF vs. FPEI
GPRF (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF) and FPEI (First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. GPRF is passively managed, while FPEI is actively managed. Over the past year, GPRF returned 6.57% vs 8.60% for FPEI. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPRF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FPEI.
Performance
GPRF vs. FPEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than FPEI's 1.56% return.
GPRF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPEI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 8.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
GPRF vs. FPEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 1.33% | 6.17% | 2.34% |
FPEI First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 1.56% | 9.82% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRF and FPEI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between GPRF and FPEI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPRF vs. FPEI — Risk / Return Rank
GPRF
FPEI
GPRF vs. FPEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPRF | FPEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.54 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.38 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 11.84 | -4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPRF | FPEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.34 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.57 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
GPRF vs. FPEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum FPEI drawdown of -27.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and FPEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRF | FPEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -27.51% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -3.63% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.16% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -3.06% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.73% | +0.15% |
Volatility
GPRF vs. FPEI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is 0.78%, while First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that GPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPRF | FPEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.95% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 3.06% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 3.69% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 5.97% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 8.86% | -4.92% |
GPRF vs. FPEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FPEI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPRF vs. FPEI - Dividend Comparison
GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than FPEI's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPEI First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 5.72% | 5.62% | 5.55% | 5.76% | 5.20% | 4.46% | 4.90% | 5.02% | 5.81% | 1.50% |
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 5.65% | 5.38% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPRF and FPEI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPEI has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to GPRF (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs FPEI's -27.51%.
On 1-year performance, FPEI leads with 8.60% vs 6.57% for GPRF. On fees, GPRF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GPRF has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FPEI has performed better with a 8.60% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPRF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPEI.
FPEI has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 5.65% for GPRF.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.85% for FPEI.
FPEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPRF and FPEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer