PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPPIX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPPIX achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than GCGIX's 4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GPPIX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 2.55%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.


GPPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
2.55%

GCGIX

1D
-1.34%
1M
4.76%
YTD
4.76%
6M
4.09%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
28.06%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPPIX
Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund
1.56%4.83%5.21%4.50%0.73%-0.00%1.43%3.05%2.16%1.44%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
4.76%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GPPIX and GCGIX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPPIX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPPIX
GPPIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GPPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GPPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPPIXGCGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.14

1.25

+2.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.07

1.29

+13.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

68.46

4.22

+64.24

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPPIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPPIX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPPIXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

1.42

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.66

0.73

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.38

0.83

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

0.46

+1.84

Drawdowns

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPPIX drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPPIX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPPIXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-65.78%

+62.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-17.25%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.40%

-25.10%

+24.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.77%

-32.57%

+31.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.08%

-32.94%

+29.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.64%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-20.82%

+20.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

5.25%

-5.19%

Volatility

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund (GPPIX) is 0.33%, while Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that GPPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPPIXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

3.60%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.85%

11.88%

-11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30%

15.71%

-14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.25%

22.24%

-20.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.07%

21.56%

-20.49%

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPPIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPPIX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GPPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than GCGIX's 7.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.16%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GPPIX
Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund
4.23%4.51%4.77%3.68%1.22%0.30%1.12%2.61%2.24%1.33%0.94%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPPIX and GCGIX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCGIX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to GPPIX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPPIX dropped -3.08% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GPPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPPIX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer