GPN vs. PHSP.L
GPN (Global Payments Inc.) is a stock, while PHSP.L (WisdomTree Physical Silver) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, GPN returned -0.28%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for PHSP.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPN vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GPN is traded in USD, while PHSP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHSP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than PHSP.L's -5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed PHSP.L with an annualized return of -0.28%, while PHSP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
PHSP.L
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -23.79%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 40.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
GPN vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | -5.94% | 147.01% | 20.80% | -1.58% | 3.15% | -12.90% | 45.17% | 17.09% | -9.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and PHSP.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPN vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GPN
PHSP.L
GPN vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPN | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.29 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 1.92 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 4.25 | -5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPN vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, smaller than the maximum PHSP.L drawdown of -77.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and PHSP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPN | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -77.00% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.95% | -43.79% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -43.79% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.52% | -43.79% | -22.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -43.79% | -26.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.54% | -40.99% | -26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -52.73% | +33.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 19.87% | -4.95% |
Volatility
GPN vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) is 13.23%, while WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that GPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPN | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.23% | 15.36% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 53.31% | -22.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.63% | 56.19% | -16.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.64% | 38.04% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 32.28% | +2.27% |
Dividends
GPN vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPN and PHSP.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GPN and PHSP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer