PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPN vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPN vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -12.05% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of -0.61%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.


GPN

1D
-8.35%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
-12.05%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
-9.35%
3Y*
-11.34%
5Y*
-18.22%
10Y*
-0.61%

HYG

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.73%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPN vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-12.05%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.32%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GPN and HYG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007

0.45

The correlation between GPN and HYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPN vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPN vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPNHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.33

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

2.79

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

12.34

-12.99

GPN vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPN and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPNHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

1.72

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.50

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.60

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.46

-0.08

Drawdowns

GPN vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPNHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-34.25%

-35.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.70%

-2.34%

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.78%

-4.56%

-49.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.40%

-15.79%

-50.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-22.03%

-48.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.60%

-0.28%

-67.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.85%

-3.24%

-15.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.27%

0.53%

+13.74%

Volatility

GPN vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 11.70% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.21%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPNHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

1.21%

+10.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.17%

3.01%

+27.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.17%

3.81%

+35.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.51%

7.53%

+28.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.49%

8.29%

+26.20%

Dividends

GPN vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than HYG's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.47%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.92%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPN and HYG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPN has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.06% vs HYG's -34.25%.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPN and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer