PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPN vs. FFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPN vs. FFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than FFIV's 55.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed FFIV with an annualized return of -0.28%, while FFIV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


GPN

1D
3.87%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-11.90%
6M
-16.89%
1Y
-12.09%
3Y*
-11.36%
5Y*
-18.15%
10Y*
-0.28%

FFIV

1D
0.59%
1M
10.84%
YTD
55.20%
6M
50.82%
1Y
35.83%
3Y*
38.11%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPN vs. FFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-11.90%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
55.20%1.51%40.50%24.72%-41.36%39.09%25.99%-13.81%23.48%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GPN and FFIV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001

0.35

The correlation between GPN and FFIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GPN:

-$3.90

FFIV:

$12.19

PS Ratio

GPN:

1.39

FFIV:

9.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPN:

$8.83B

FFIV:

$2.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPN:

$4.25B

FFIV:

$2.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

GPN:

$2.27B

FFIV:

$889.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPN vs. FFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FFIV
FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPN vs. FFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPNFFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.21

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

1.04

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.81

2.28

-3.09

GPN vs. FFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the FFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPN and FFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPN vs. FFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, smaller than the maximum FFIV drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and FFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPNFFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.17%

-97.59%

+27.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.95%

-34.73%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.95%

-34.73%

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.52%

-47.42%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.17%

-54.59%

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.54%

-3.17%

-64.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-40.16%

+21.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.92%

15.77%

-0.85%

Volatility

GPN vs. FFIV - Volatility Comparison

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) at 8.89%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPNFFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.23%

8.89%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.58%

24.72%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.63%

33.48%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

29.97%

+6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

29.56%

+4.99%

Dividends

GPN vs. FFIV - Dividend Comparison

GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.85%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%

Financials

GPN vs. FFIV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and F5 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.97B
0
(GPN) Total Revenue
(FFIV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GPN and FFIV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to FFIV (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.17% vs FFIV's -97.59%.

FFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPN and FFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer