GPMIX vs. SIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund (GPMIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX).
GPMIX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012. SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMIX GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund | 1.43% | 12.93% | 7.53% | 9.39% | -12.18% | 11.60% | 0.71% | 16.31% | -6.11% | 9.74% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 9.34% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPMIX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GPMIX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 5.27%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.
GPMIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
SIFAX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 11.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPMIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPMIX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
GPMIX
SIFAX
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund (GPMIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPMIX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 2.19 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 3.07 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 3.74 | -2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 9.56 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPMIX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.19 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 1.27 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.77 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.36 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPMIX and SIFAX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison
GPMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than SIFAX's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMIX GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund | 3.85% | 3.87% | 4.21% | 3.93% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 2.60% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 2.61% | 3.05% | 3.60% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.16% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPMIX drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMIX and SIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPMIX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.61% | -23.62% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.45% | -3.07% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -8.32% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.61% | -14.69% | -12.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | 0.00% | -4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -8.65% | +5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.25% | +0.27% |
Volatility
GPMIX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison
GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund (GPMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.03%. This indicates that GPMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPMIX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.03% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 3.91% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.01% | 5.30% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 5.50% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.80% | 5.16% | +4.64% |