PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPMIX vs. FIQDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund (GPMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPMIX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than FIQDX's 8.84% return.


GPMIX

1D
0.40%
1M
1.78%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.88%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.66%

FIQDX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.09%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GPMIX
GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund
7.39%12.93%7.53%9.39%-12.18%11.60%0.71%16.31%-4.46%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
8.84%10.40%6.03%4.55%-3.17%15.96%3.79%10.63%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GPMIX and FIQDX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.71

The correlation between GPMIX and FIQDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPMIX vs. FIQDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPMIX
GPMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GPMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQDX
FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund (GPMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPMIXFIQDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.73

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

8.62

-5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

32.18

-17.96

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FIQDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPMIX and FIQDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPMIXFIQDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

3.62

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.94

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.90

-0.35

Drawdowns

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPMIX drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, which is greater than FIQDX's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMIX and FIQDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPMIXFIQDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.61%

-19.98%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-1.94%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.82%

-5.91%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-12.79%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-2.98%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.52%

+0.65%

Volatility

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Volatility Comparison

GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund (GPMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) at 1.32%. This indicates that GPMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPMIXFIQDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.32%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

3.61%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.57%

4.65%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.99%

6.91%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

7.41%

+2.42%

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPMIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FIQDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPMIX vs. FIQDX - Dividend Comparison

GPMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than FIQDX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
4.19%4.75%4.88%5.38%7.39%5.44%2.29%3.17%8.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPMIX
GuidePath Multi-Asset Income Allocation Fund
3.63%3.87%4.21%3.93%3.63%2.67%2.60%3.33%3.58%2.61%3.05%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPMIX and FIQDX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPMIX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to FIQDX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPMIX dropped -27.61% vs FIQDX's -19.98%.

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPMIX and FIQDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer