GPM.L vs. CYN.L
GPM.L (Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd) and CYN.L (CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, GPM.L returned 12.85%/yr vs 20.88%/yr for CYN.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPM.L achieves a 20.74% return, which is significantly higher than CYN.L's 9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GPM.L has underperformed CYN.L with an annualized return of 12.85%, while CYN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.88% annualized return.
GPM.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 20.74%
- 6M
- 31.98%
- 1Y
- 110.19%
- 3Y*
- 52.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
CYN.L
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -5.68%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 22.56%
- 1Y
- 97.88%
- 3Y*
- 36.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.38%
- 10Y*
- 20.88%
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPM.L Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd | 20.74% | 164.79% | 20.34% | -14.24% | -19.06% | -20.56% | 69.84% | 77.46% | -44.09% | -14.48% |
CYN.L CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc | 9.44% | 101.77% | 16.77% | -11.97% | 30.32% | 30.33% | 53.89% | 5.38% | -23.71% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPM.L and CYN.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2006 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, GPM.L and CYN.L have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GPM.L:
£111.43M
CYN.L:
£184.83M
GPM.L:
£0.91
CYN.L:
£1.09
GPM.L:
1.25
CYN.L:
3.43
GPM.L:
1.35
CYN.L:
21.71
GPM.L:
0.89
CYN.L:
1.49
GPM.L:
£79.15M
CYN.L:
£9.81M
GPM.L:
£79.06M
CYN.L:
£17.09M
GPM.L:
£85.71M
CYN.L:
£64.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPM.L vs. CYN.L — Risk / Return Rank
GPM.L
CYN.L
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc (CYN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPM.L | CYN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.24 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 12.11 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPM.L | CYN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.64 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.68 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.77 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.31 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPM.L drawdown since its inception was -86.38%, which is greater than CYN.L's maximum drawdown of -79.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPM.L and CYN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPM.L | CYN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.38% | -79.15% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.61% | -22.95% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.61% | -22.95% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.34% | -35.36% | -25.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.79% | -59.32% | -9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.95% | -13.32% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.10% | -31.96% | -27.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.10% | 8.05% | +4.05% |
Volatility
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Volatility Comparison
Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc (CYN.L) have volatilities of 9.16% and 8.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPM.L | CYN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 8.98% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | 27.74% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.10% | 36.94% | +12.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.19% | 31.52% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 26.89% | +12.78% |
Dividends
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Dividend Comparison
GPM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CYN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYN.L CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc | 6.86% | 3.60% | 3.55% | 5.21% | 2.85% | 3.60% | 4.52% | 6.50% | 6.89% | 4.65% | 4.48% | 6.83% |
GPM.L Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GPM.L vs. CYN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GPM.L and CYN.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GPM.L and CYN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer