PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GPM.L vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GPM.L and VOO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

GPM.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
18.99%
10.20%
GPM.L
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GPM.L:

1.07

VOO:

1.92

Sortino Ratio

GPM.L:

1.52

VOO:

2.58

Omega Ratio

GPM.L:

1.28

VOO:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

GPM.L:

0.53

VOO:

2.88

Martin Ratio

GPM.L:

3.81

VOO:

12.03

Ulcer Index

GPM.L:

11.36%

VOO:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

GPM.L:

40.32%

VOO:

12.69%

Max Drawdown

GPM.L:

-86.38%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

GPM.L:

-64.30%

VOO:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPM.L achieves a 28.17% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GPM.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.38%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.


GPM.L

YTD

28.17%

1M

22.97%

6M

22.97%

1Y

42.19%

5Y*

7.50%

10Y*

4.38%

VOO

YTD

4.36%

1M

2.34%

6M

10.20%

1Y

24.11%

5Y*

14.50%

10Y*

13.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GPM.L vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPM.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GPM.L is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GPM.L is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GPM.L is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GPM.L is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GPM.L is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GPM.L is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GPM.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GPM.L, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.131.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for GPM.L, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.572.42
The chart of Omega ratio for GPM.L, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.281.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for GPM.L, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.562.66
The chart of Martin ratio for GPM.L, currently valued at 3.81, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.8111.10
GPM.L
VOO

The current GPM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPM.L and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.13
1.81
GPM.L
VOO

Dividends

GPM.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GPM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GPM.L
Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

GPM.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPM.L drawdown since its inception was -86.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPM.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-71.40%
0
GPM.L
VOO

Volatility

GPM.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Golden Prospect Precious Metals Ltd (GPM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.01%. This indicates that GPM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.83%
3.01%
GPM.L
VOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab