PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.94% return.


GPIX

1D
1.51%
1M
2.08%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.95%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.05%
1M
2.89%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.24%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
0.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
10.28%16.25%21.77%13.04%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.94%11.36%-2.18%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and TLTW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPIXTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.22

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

1.60

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.40

4.63

+11.77

GPIX vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-18.61%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-5.97%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.50%

+2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-8.20%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.06%

-0.49%

Volatility

GPIX vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 2.31%. This indicates that GPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

2.31%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

5.84%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

7.66%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

11.35%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

11.35%

+2.53%

GPIX vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, less than TLTW's 11.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
7.97%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.67%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and TLTW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to TLTW (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.72% vs 9.50% for TLTW. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TLTW.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.67%, compared with 7.97% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.35% for TLTW.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer