PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 15.55% return.


GPIX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.01%
6M
7.83%
YTD
9.04%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.49%

IEMG

1D
-1.78%
1M
-6.23%
6M
7.28%
YTD
15.55%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
8.78%
ALL TIME*
6.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$50.34M$51.86M$49.74M
$959.90M$1.12B$1.07B

GPIX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.04%16.25%21.77%13.04%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
15.55%32.56%6.50%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and IEMG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.66

The correlation between GPIX and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GPIX vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIX
IEMG

Technology

38.5%
43.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
17.3%

Communication Services

9.5%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.7%

Healthcare

8.9%
3.2%

Industrials

8.4%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.8%

Energy

3.0%
3.0%

Utilities

2.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.8%

Technology

GPIX
38.5%
IEMG
43.6%

Financial Services

GPIX
11.9%
IEMG
17.3%

Communication Services

GPIX
9.5%
IEMG
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GPIX
9.5%
IEMG
7.7%

Healthcare

GPIX
8.9%
IEMG
3.2%

Industrials

GPIX
8.4%
IEMG
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

GPIX
4.7%
IEMG
2.8%

Energy

GPIX
3.0%
IEMG
3.0%

Utilities

GPIX
2.2%
IEMG
1.9%

Real Estate

GPIX
1.8%
IEMG
1.5%

Basic Materials

GPIX
1.7%
IEMG
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPIXIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.13

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

6.72

+4.38

GPIX vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-38.71%

+21.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-13.21%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-10.41%

+8.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-12.90%

+11.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

4.19%

-2.57%

Volatility

GPIX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 2.63%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

7.86%

-5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

21.27%

-12.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

23.23%

-12.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

19.21%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

20.26%

-6.51%

GPIX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than IEMG's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.19%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and IEMG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to GPIX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 1-year performance, IEMG leads with 28.48% vs 17.54% for GPIX. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 28.48% return vs 17.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 2.33% for IEMG.

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.09% for IEMG.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer