PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. ARKB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. ARKB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than ARKB's -23.93% return.


GPIX

1D
1.51%
1M
2.08%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.95%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARKB

1D
4.79%
1M
-15.85%
YTD
-23.93%
6M
-22.44%
1Y
-36.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. ARKB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
10.28%16.25%21.05%
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
-23.93%-6.59%86.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and ARKB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. ARKB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKB
ARKB Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKB Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. ARKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPIXARKBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.87

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-0.71

+4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.40

-1.24

+17.64

GPIX vs. ARKB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the ARKB Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and ARKB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. ARKB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum ARKB drawdown of -52.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and ARKB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXARKBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-52.04%

+34.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-52.04%

+44.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-47.03%

+46.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-16.61%

+15.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

29.75%

-28.18%

Volatility

GPIX vs. ARKB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 4.00%, while ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXARKBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

12.88%

-8.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

34.67%

-26.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

44.23%

-33.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

50.14%

-36.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

50.14%

-36.26%

GPIX vs. ARKB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKB's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. ARKB - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, while ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
7.97%8.01%7.45%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and ARKB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKB has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to GPIX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs ARKB's -52.04%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.72% vs -36.82% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.72% return vs -36.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while ARKB is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.21% for ARKB.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and ARKB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer