PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIQ vs. ACSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
-3.90%19.77%23.22%15.38%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
-3.29%10.70%22.51%17.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's -3.29% return.


GPIQ

1D
3.19%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACSI

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-3.29%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GPIQ vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSI
ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIQACSIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

0.61

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

0.98

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.03

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.84

4.19

+4.65

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the ACSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and ACSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIQACSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.61

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.68

+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and ACSI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than ACSI's 0.94% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
10.68%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
0.94%0.91%0.69%1.01%0.81%0.31%0.82%1.64%1.59%1.20%0.18%

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and ACSI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIQACSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-34.49%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-9.91%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-5.67%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-5.47%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.43%

+0.19%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) at 4.72%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GPIQACSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

4.72%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

8.54%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

15.67%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

16.66%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

17.50%

+0.24%