GOVZ vs. FTGC
GOVZ (iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GOVZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. GOVZ is passively managed, while FTGC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GOVZ returned -11.87%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for FTGC. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. GOVZ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOVZ achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 18.86% return.
GOVZ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- -7.55%
- 5Y*
- -11.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF | 1.25% | -1.81% | -16.24% | 0.90% | -41.03% | -4.86% | -5.61% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 18.86% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOVZ and FTGC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | -0.10 |
The correlation between GOVZ and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOVZ vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
GOVZ
FTGC
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOVZ | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.32 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 2.60 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 9.67 | -9.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOVZ drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVZ and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOVZ | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.65% | -59.47% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.16% | -10.87% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -10.87% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -22.64% | -34.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.51% | -10.87% | -44.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.03% | -27.34% | -12.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 2.94% | +3.56% |
Volatility
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 3.07%. This indicates that GOVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOVZ | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.07% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 13.21% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 15.70% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 15.87% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 14.71% | +8.57% |
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOVZ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOVZ vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
GOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than FTGC's 16.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.13% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF | 5.07% | 5.00% | 4.68% | 3.84% | 3.69% | 1.76% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOVZ and FTGC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOVZ has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FTGC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOVZ dropped -59.65% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
On 5-year performance, FTGC leads with 12.29% vs -11.87% for GOVZ. On fees, GOVZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 12.29% return vs -11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOVZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 5.07% for GOVZ.
GOVZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GOVZ and 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOVZ and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer