PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOU vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOU vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's -0.36% return.


GOU

1D
13.42%
1M
-4.86%
6M
-1.53%
YTD
13.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NVDG

1D
5.91%
1M
4.55%
6M
-3.62%
YTD
-0.36%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.72M$2.58M$2.18M
$3.01M$3.98M$6.31M

GOU vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOU and NVDG is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOU vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOU vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOUNVDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

GOU vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOU vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum NVDG drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOUNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-66.19%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.96%

-31.58%

+5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-23.52%

+8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.96%

Volatility

GOU vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOUNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.73%

72.25%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.73%

89.76%

-25.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.73%

89.76%

-25.03%

GOU vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOU vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

GOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOU and NVDG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GOU.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 11.85%, compared with 0.00% for GOU.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 0.75% for NVDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOU and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer