GOU vs. INTW
GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOU charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
GOU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 463.06% return.
GOU
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -27.59%
- 6M
- 277.56%
- YTD
- 463.06%
- 1Y
- 1,035.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF | 16.76% | -4.00% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 463.06% | -17.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOU and INTW is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
GOU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
GOU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 20.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 45.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -60.58% | +22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.84% | -42.05% | +18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -29.50% | +16.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.54% | — |
Volatility
GOU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 53.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 123.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.81% | 152.57% | -92.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.81% | 149.22% | -89.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.81% | 149.22% | -89.41% |
GOU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOU and INTW have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOU is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOU is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
GOU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for GOU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer