GOU vs. BRKL
GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GOU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
GOU vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOU
- 1D
- 13.42%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $3.72M | $2.58M | $2.18M |
GOU vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF | -8.03% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOU and BRKL is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOU vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOU vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -7.03% | -33.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -0.13% | -25.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -4.14% | -10.45% |
Volatility
GOU vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.73% | 30.99% | +33.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.73% | 30.99% | +33.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.73% | 30.99% | +33.74% |
GOU vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOU vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOU nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOU and BRKL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for GOU.
GOU and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for GOU and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for GOU and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer