PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOY vs. LRCU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOY vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 314.98% return.


GOOY

1D
1.84%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
16.01%
6M
17.06%
1Y
84.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LRCU

1D
12.70%
1M
77.20%
YTD
314.98%
6M
346.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
16.01%39.42%
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
314.98%172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and LRCU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOY vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOYLRCUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.35

GOOY vs. LRCU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and LRCU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOYLRCUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-40.09%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.68%

0.00%

-6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-9.29%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

Volatility

GOOY vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOYLRCUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.39%

114.38%

-90.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.30%

114.38%

-91.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

114.38%

-91.08%

GOOY vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOY vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.88%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
48.88%41.50%36.74%7.90%
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOY and LRCU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 48.88%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

GOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOY and 1.30% for LRCU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOY and LRCU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer