GOOY vs. KLIP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).

GOOY and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GOOY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jul 27, 2023. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.

Performance

GOOY vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GOOY vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	-5.06%	53.95%	12.58%	-3.73%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-8.98%	16.92%	3.37%	6.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.

GOOY

• 1D: 4.10%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: -5.06%
• 6M: 16.08%
• 1Y: 70.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLIP

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -12.63%
• 1Y: -1.25%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.

GOOY

YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF

KLIP

KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

GOOY vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY

GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 97
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 11
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOOY	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	-0.06	+2.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	0.05	+3.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.01	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	-0.08	+4.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.25	-0.26	+17.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOOY vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOY Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOY and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOY	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	-0.06	+2.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.35	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and KLIP is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GOOY vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.24%, more than KLIP's 28.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	49.24%	41.50%	36.74%	7.90%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	28.24%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOY	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-18.61%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.15%	-17.23%	+1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.57%	-14.21%	+1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-3.34%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	5.18%	-1.13%

Volatility

GOOY vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 7.16%. This indicates that GOOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOY	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	7.16%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.10%	13.48%	+2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.59%	19.76%	+4.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.86%	18.19%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.86%	18.19%	+4.67%