PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOY vs. FRNW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOY vs. FRNW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than FRNW's 23.12% return.


GOOY

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
13.92%
6M
14.56%
1Y
81.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRNW

1D
1.22%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
23.12%
6M
22.47%
1Y
62.88%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. FRNW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
13.92%53.95%12.58%-3.35%
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
23.12%53.20%-21.11%-14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and FRNW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOY vs. FRNW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNW
FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. FRNW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOYFRNWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.37

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

4.48

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.64

15.67

+2.98

GOOY vs. FRNW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOY Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the FRNW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOY and FRNW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. FRNW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum FRNW drawdown of -59.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and FRNW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOYFRNWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-59.37%

+34.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.15%

-14.20%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.37%

-11.09%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-33.17%

+26.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.05%

+0.33%

Volatility

GOOY vs. FRNW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is 6.21%, while Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that GOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOYFRNWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

10.63%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

19.61%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.33%

26.92%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

28.52%

-5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

28.52%

-5.23%

GOOY vs. FRNW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FRNW's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOY vs. FRNW - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.78%, more than FRNW's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
1.02%1.25%1.43%1.30%0.69%0.04%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
49.78%41.50%36.74%7.90%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOY and FRNW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRNW has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs FRNW's -59.37%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 62.88% for FRNW. On fees, FRNW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 62.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FRNW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 49.78%, compared with 1.02% for FRNW.

GOOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FRNW is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOY and 0.39% for FRNW.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOY and FRNW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer