PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOX vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 345.14% return.


GOOX

1D
1.59%
1M
7.84%
6M
7.89%
YTD
26.02%
1Y
200.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
72.21%

INTW

1D
21.94%
1M
-35.28%
6M
178.42%
YTD
345.14%
1Y
1,221.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
281.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.51M$7.09M$7.60M
$149.69M$131.79M$210.25M

GOOX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOX and INTW is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOX
GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOXINTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.53

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

17.87

-12.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

47.29

-34.00

GOOX vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 7.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOX and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -69.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and INTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOXINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.46%

-69.16%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.00%

-69.16%

+30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.24%

-54.18%

+37.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-30.75%

+13.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.14%

26.08%

-10.94%

Volatility

GOOX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) is 27.30%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 52.57%. This indicates that GOOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOXINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.30%

52.57%

-25.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.45%

117.90%

-68.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.04%

158.42%

-94.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.93%

151.25%

-89.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.93%

151.25%

-89.32%

GOOX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
0.24%0.30%16.78%
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOX and INTW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTW has higher volatility (52.57%) compared to GOOX (27.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs INTW's -69.16%.

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1221.95% vs 200.27% for GOOX. On fees, GOOX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, GOOX has been the lower-risk option at 27.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1221.95% return vs 200.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

GOOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GOOX and 1.50% for INTW.

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.80 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOX and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer