GOOY vs. FBY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOY returned 88.26% vs -6.53% for FBY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

GOOY vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -5.84% return.

GOOY

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 88.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: 3.88%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: -5.84%
• 6M: -4.65%
• 1Y: -6.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	13.61%	53.95%	12.58%	-3.73%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-5.84%	1.98%	44.42%	15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and FBY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023	0.47

Return for Risk

GOOY vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY

GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 92
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOOY	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.84	-0.23	+4.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.10	-0.12	+5.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	0.98	+0.66
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.50	-0.22	+5.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.08	-0.49	+21.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOOY vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOY Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOY and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOY	FBY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84	-0.23	+4.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.64	+0.45

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum FBY drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOY	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-31.53%	+7.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.15%	-29.50%	+13.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.61%	-19.08%	+10.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-7.82%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	13.41%	-9.21%

Volatility

GOOY vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) have volatilities of 6.90% and 7.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOY	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.90%	7.24%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.19%	22.27%	-5.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.19%	28.89%	-5.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.31%	28.53%	-5.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.31%	28.53%	-5.22%

GOOY vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOY and FBY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

GOOY vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.99%, less than FBY's 55.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	55.74%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	50.99%	41.50%	36.74%	7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOY and FBY in my portfolio?

GOOY and FBY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOOY or FBY?

FBY has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to GOOY (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, GOOY or FBY?

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs -6.53% for FBY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOOY or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs -6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOY or FBY?

GOOY and FBY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOY or FBY?

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 55.74%, compared with 50.99% for GOOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.