PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOGL vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOGL vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOGL has outperformed T with an annualized return of 25.76%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


GOOGL

1D
0.53%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
15.06%
6M
16.44%
1Y
105.30%
3Y*
43.10%
5Y*
24.46%
10Y*
25.76%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOGL vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
15.06%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOGL and T is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2004

0.24

The correlation between GOOGL and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GOOGL:

$13.11

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

GOOGL:

27.43

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

GOOGL:

1.35

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

GOOGL:

10.40

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOGL:

$422.57B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOGL:

$255.12B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOGL:

$174.08B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOGL vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOGL vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

0.92

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

-0.59

+5.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

-1.22

+19.70

GOOGL vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOGL Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOGL and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOGL vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-64.15%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-21.87%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-21.87%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.32%

-32.01%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-42.35%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-18.12%

+7.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-15.72%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

10.64%

-4.92%

Volatility

GOOGL vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) is 7.24%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that GOOGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

8.21%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

17.80%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.31%

22.13%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.33%

24.01%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

23.73%

+5.40%

Dividends

GOOGL vs. T - Dividend Comparison

GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

GOOGL vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc. Class A and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
33.47B
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOGL and T have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to GOOGL (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOGL dropped -65.29% vs T's -64.15%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOGL and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer