PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOOGL is traded in USD, while LOOMIS.ST is traded in SEK. To make them comparable, the LOOMIS.ST values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly lower than LOOMIS.ST's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOGL has outperformed LOOMIS.ST with an annualized return of 25.76%, while LOOMIS.ST has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


GOOGL

1D
0.53%
1M
-10.27%
YTD
15.06%
6M
16.44%
1Y
106.51%
3Y*
43.10%
5Y*
24.46%
10Y*
25.76%

LOOMIS.ST

1D
0.87%
1M
1.44%
YTD
21.67%
6M
29.31%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
15.06%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
21.67%44.36%20.85%0.54%6.63%-1.39%-31.90%34.11%-22.09%44.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOGL and LOOMIS.ST is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2008

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LOOMIS.ST
LOOMIS.ST Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOGLLOOMIS.STDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.21

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

1.50

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

3.36

+15.12

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOGL Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOGL and LOOMIS.ST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, roughly equal to the maximum LOOMIS.ST drawdown of -65.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and LOOMIS.ST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGLLOOMIS.STDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-65.38%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-18.97%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-23.32%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.32%

-31.85%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-65.38%

+21.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-3.52%

-7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-15.84%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

8.44%

-2.72%

Volatility

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) have volatilities of 7.24% and 7.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGLLOOMIS.STDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

7.19%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

21.39%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.31%

27.14%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.33%

31.92%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

34.93%

-5.80%

Dividends

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Dividend Comparison

GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than LOOMIS.ST's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
4.29%3.59%3.72%4.48%2.97%2.49%2.43%2.58%3.15%2.32%2.58%2.27%

Financials

GOOGL vs. LOOMIS.ST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Loomis AB ser. B. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GOOGL values in USD, LOOMIS.ST values in SEK

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOGL and LOOMIS.ST have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOGL and LOOMIS.ST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer