GOOGL vs. LCID
GOOGL (Alphabet Inc. Class A) and LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) are both stocks. GOOGL operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while LCID operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, GOOGL returned 25.32%/yr vs -53.01%/yr for LCID. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOOGL vs. LCID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than LCID's -49.29% return.
GOOGL
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 112.95%
- 3Y*
- 44.32%
- 5Y*
- 25.32%
- 10Y*
- 26.53%
LCID
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- -49.29%
- 6M
- -54.65%
- 1Y
- -75.86%
- 3Y*
- -56.43%
- 5Y*
- -53.01%
- 10Y*
- —
GOOGL vs. LCID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 17.73% | 65.99% | 36.01% | 58.32% | -39.09% | 65.30% | 17.86% |
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | -49.29% | -65.00% | -28.27% | -38.36% | -82.05% | 280.12% | -2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOGL and LCID is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between GOOGL and LCID shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GOOGL:
$4.50T
LCID:
$17.60B
GOOGL:
$13.11
LCID:
-$3.19
GOOGL:
10.64
LCID:
5.05
GOOGL:
$422.57B
LCID:
$1.12B
GOOGL:
$255.12B
LCID:
-$1.62B
GOOGL:
$174.08B
LCID:
-$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOGL vs. LCID — Risk / Return Rank
GOOGL
LCID
GOOGL vs. LCID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOGL | LCID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 0.77 | +0.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.58 | -0.89 | +6.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.64 | -1.32 | +20.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOGL vs. LCID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, smaller than the maximum LCID drawdown of -99.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and LCID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOGL | LCID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.29% | -99.19% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.37% | -84.98% | +64.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.81% | -94.21% | +64.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.32% | -99.15% | +54.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.54% | -99.08% | +90.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -76.30% | +63.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 57.36% | -51.57% |
Volatility
GOOGL vs. LCID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) is 8.18%, while Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a volatility of 22.77%. This indicates that GOOGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOGL | LCID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 22.77% | -14.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.99% | 52.03% | -31.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 78.04% | -48.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.38% | 81.64% | -50.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 86.75% | -57.61% |
Dividends
GOOGL vs. LCID - Dividend Comparison
GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while LCID has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.32% |
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GOOGL vs. LCID - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Lucid Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOGL and LCID have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCID has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to GOOGL (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOGL dropped -65.29% vs LCID's -99.19%.
GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOGL and LCID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer