PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOOGL is traded in USD, while CNQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CNQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ.TO's 34.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOGL has outperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 25.76%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 22.36% annualized return.


GOOGL

1D
0.53%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
15.06%
6M
16.44%
1Y
105.30%
3Y*
43.10%
5Y*
24.46%
10Y*
25.76%

CNQ.TO

1D
-0.48%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
34.74%
6M
38.66%
1Y
44.24%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
30.02%
10Y*
22.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
15.06%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
34.74%15.70%-0.18%30.08%53.38%91.35%-10.82%44.81%-27.46%18.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOGL and CNQ.TO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.24

The correlation between GOOGL and CNQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOGL:

$4.40T

CNQ.TO:

CA$132.89B

EPS

GOOGL:

$13.11

CNQ.TO:

CA$4.65

PE Ratio

GOOGL:

27.43

CNQ.TO:

13.64

PEG Ratio

GOOGL:

1.35

CNQ.TO:

0.66

PS Ratio

GOOGL:

10.40

CNQ.TO:

3.34

PB Ratio

GOOGL:

9.19

CNQ.TO:

2.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOGL:

$422.57B

CNQ.TO:

CA$39.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOGL:

$255.12B

CNQ.TO:

CA$12.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOGL:

$174.08B

CNQ.TO:

CA$17.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ.TO
CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOGLCNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.26

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

3.08

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

6.83

+11.65

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOGL Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOGL and CNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, smaller than the maximum CNQ.TO drawdown of -76.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and CNQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGLCNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-76.64%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-14.43%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-36.25%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.32%

-36.25%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-76.64%

+32.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-9.64%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-21.20%

+8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

6.49%

-0.77%

Volatility

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) is 7.24%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that GOOGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGLCNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

8.84%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

24.25%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.31%

29.57%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.33%

31.39%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.13%

38.81%

-9.68%

Dividends

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than CNQ.TO's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.77%5.05%6.00%8.53%12.23%7.63%11.35%7.29%8.31%5.00%4.49%6.22%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
10.81B
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
(CNQ.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GOOGL values in USD, CNQ.TO values in CAD

GOOGL vs. CNQ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Canadian Natural Resources Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
62.5%
32.1%
Portfolio components
GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

CNQ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 10.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

CNQ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.

CNQ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOGL and CNQ.TO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOGL and CNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer