GOODX vs. SMVTX
GOODX (GoodHaven Fund) and SMVTX (Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GOODX returned 9.64%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for SMVTX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GOODX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SMVTX.
Performance
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOODX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than SMVTX's 16.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GOODX has underperformed SMVTX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while SMVTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
GOODX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.94%
SMVTX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GOODX GoodHaven Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOODX GoodHaven Fund | -0.14% | 7.04% | 18.87% | 34.07% | -11.51% | 35.97% | 6.32% | 19.03% | -9.76% | 3.95% |
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 16.53% | 17.58% | 18.93% | 10.94% | -13.89% | 29.15% | -1.19% | 33.14% | -8.01% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOODX and SMVTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GOODX and SMVTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOODX vs. SMVTX — Risk / Return Rank
GOODX
SMVTX
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOODX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.28 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 3.31 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 10.95 | -10.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOODX drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum SMVTX drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOODX and SMVTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOODX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -54.72% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -8.10% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -24.75% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.74% | -25.44% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.58% | -45.45% | +6.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -7.01% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -8.20% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 2.45% | +2.10% |
Volatility
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) is 3.13%, while Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that GOODX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMVTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOODX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 4.12% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 12.77% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 16.44% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 20.55% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 20.60% | -3.42% |
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOODX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SMVTX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOODX vs. SMVTX - Dividend Comparison
GOODX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than SMVTX's 14.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOODX GoodHaven Fund | 3.00% | 3.00% | 2.43% | 1.44% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.45% | 1.27% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 14.98% | 16.44% | 15.96% | 1.16% | 6.75% | 18.53% | 2.52% | 5.82% | 14.47% | 20.86% | 3.61% | 7.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOODX and SMVTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMVTX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to GOODX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOODX dropped -41.43% vs SMVTX's -54.72%.
SMVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOODX and SMVTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer