PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOODX vs. PVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOODX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than PVMIX's 15.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GOODX has underperformed PVMIX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while PVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


GOODX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.27%
6M
0.12%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
7.94%

PVMIX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.02%
6M
10.20%
YTD
15.94%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
12.72%
ALL TIME*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOODX
GoodHaven Fund
-0.14%7.04%18.87%34.07%-11.51%35.97%6.32%19.03%-9.76%3.95%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
15.94%6.09%33.38%11.04%-5.95%30.97%6.50%26.69%-11.07%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GOODX and PVMIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.81

The correlation between GOODX and PVMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOODX vs. PVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOODX
GOODX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GOODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOODX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GOODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOODX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PVMIX
PVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOODXPVMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.30

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

2.66

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

9.59

-9.04

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOODX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the PVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOODX and PVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOODX drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum PVMIX drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOODX and PVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOODXPVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-56.76%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-7.37%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-16.78%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.74%

-17.05%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.58%

-41.34%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-1.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-6.79%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

2.04%

+2.51%

Volatility

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Volatility Comparison

GoodHaven Fund (GOODX) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) at 2.19%. This indicates that GOODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOODXPVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.19%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

8.38%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

11.80%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.10%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

19.13%

-1.95%

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOODX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PVMIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOODX vs. PVMIX - Dividend Comparison

GOODX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than PVMIX's 6.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOODX
GoodHaven Fund
3.00%3.00%2.43%1.44%0.38%0.13%0.45%1.27%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
6.23%7.22%33.98%4.63%7.12%11.44%1.38%5.11%13.23%6.92%1.58%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOODX and PVMIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOODX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to PVMIX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOODX dropped -41.43% vs PVMIX's -56.76%.

PVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOODX and PVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer