GOLY vs. HFMF
GOLY (Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF) and HFMF (Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLY is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Gold-Backed Bond Index, while HFMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Unlimited. GOLY is passively managed, while HFMF is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HFMF.
Performance
GOLY vs. HFMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLY achieves a -19.06% return, which is significantly lower than HFMF's 7.67% return.
GOLY
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- -19.06%
- 6M
- -16.22%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
HFMF
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLY vs. HFMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLY Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | -19.06% | 25.66% |
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 7.67% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLY and HFMF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLY vs. HFMF — Risk / Return Rank
GOLY
HFMF
GOLY vs. HFMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GOLY) and Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOLY | HFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLY | HFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.99 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
GOLY vs. HFMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLY drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, which is greater than HFMF's maximum drawdown of -10.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLY and HFMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLY | HFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -10.00% | -25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.16% | -9.89% | -20.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.86% | -2.86% | -9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.99% | — | — |
Volatility
GOLY vs. HFMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLY | HFMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.89% | 16.79% | +16.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 16.79% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 16.79% | +5.42% |
GOLY vs. HFMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HFMF's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLY vs. HFMF - Dividend Comparison
GOLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than HFMF's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLY Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | 9.74% | 7.22% | 3.85% | 2.94% | 2.57% | 1.11% |
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 2.76% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLY and HFMF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOLY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOLY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HFMF.
GOLY has the higher dividend yield at 9.74%, compared with 2.76% for HFMF.
GOLY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while HFMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and Unlimited. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GOLY and 0.97% for HFMF.
Find the right allocation for GOLY and HFMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer