GOLY vs. HEFT
GOLY (Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF) and HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLY is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Gold-Backed Bond Index, while HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye. GOLY is passively managed, while HEFT is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HEFT.
Performance
GOLY vs. HEFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLY achieves a -26.33% return, which is significantly lower than HEFT's 4.79% return.
GOLY
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -26.33%
- 6M
- -28.77%
- 1Y
- -7.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLY vs. HEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLY Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | -26.33% | 5.67% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 4.79% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLY and HEFT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLY vs. HEFT — Risk / Return Rank
GOLY
HEFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GOLY vs. HEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GOLY) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLY | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLY vs. HEFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLY drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than HEFT's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLY and HEFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLY | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -9.17% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.44% | -5.46% | -30.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.10% | -3.35% | -8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.33% | — | — |
Volatility
GOLY vs. HEFT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLY | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.84% | 13.51% | +20.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 13.51% | +9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 13.51% | +8.93% |
GOLY vs. HEFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLY vs. HEFT - Dividend Comparison
GOLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than HEFT's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLY Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | 9.99% | 7.22% | 3.85% | 2.94% | 2.57% | 1.11% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLY and HEFT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GOLY.
GOLY has the higher dividend yield at 9.99%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
GOLY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while HEFT is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GOLY and 0.70% for HEFT.
Find the right allocation for GOLY and HEFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer