PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLF vs. PFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLF vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 27.57% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's 10.66% return.


GOLF

1D
0.88%
1M
-13.86%
6M
5.04%
YTD
27.57%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.15%

PFIX

1D
3.06%
1M
17.72%
6M
11.49%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
23.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.41M$30.75M$35.80M
$6.29M$5.62M$16.95M

GOLF vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
27.57%14.09%13.96%51.02%-18.69%3.53%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
10.66%0.42%35.94%5.67%92.05%-24.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLF and PFIX is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021

-0.11

The correlation between GOLF and PFIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLF vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOLF
GOLF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GOLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOLF vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLFPFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.04

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.10

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

0.15

+4.24

GOLF vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLF and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLF vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, roughly equal to the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and PFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLFPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-36.17%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-23.71%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-36.17%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-36.17%

+2.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.56%

-8.76%

-5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-17.19%

+7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

15.42%

-8.79%

Volatility

GOLF vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) have volatilities of 7.88% and 7.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLFPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

7.75%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.89%

21.92%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.39%

29.31%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

38.61%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.50%

38.13%

-6.63%

Dividends

GOLF vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than PFIX's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
1.21%1.49%1.21%1.23%1.70%1.24%1.53%1.72%2.47%2.28%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
7.82%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLF and PFIX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLF has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to PFIX (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLF and PFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer