GOLF vs. PFIX
GOLF (Acushnet Holdings Corp.) is a stock, while PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) is Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past 5 years, GOLF returned 18.81%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for PFIX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GOLF vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 36.13% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -6.98% return.
GOLF
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 22.55%
- YTD
- 36.13%
- 6M
- 32.44%
- 1Y
- 51.13%
- 3Y*
- 30.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PFIX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -11.02%
- YTD
- -6.98%
- 6M
- -6.81%
- 1Y
- -12.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- —
GOLF vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 36.13% | 14.09% | 13.96% | 51.02% | -18.69% | 3.53% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | -6.98% | 0.42% | 35.94% | 5.67% | 92.05% | -24.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLF and PFIX is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLF vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank
GOLF
PFIX
GOLF vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.95 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | -0.48 | +3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | -0.74 | +7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLF vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, roughly equal to the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and PFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -36.17% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -25.64% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -36.17% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.37% | -36.17% | +2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -23.31% | +23.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -17.15% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.07% | 16.70% | -9.63% |
Volatility
GOLF vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison
Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) at 6.85%. This indicates that GOLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 6.85% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 21.31% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.64% | 29.19% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.45% | 38.46% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.50% | 38.23% | -6.73% |
Dividends
GOLF vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison
GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than PFIX's 10.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 1.14% | 1.49% | 1.21% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.24% | 1.53% | 1.72% | 2.47% | 2.28% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 10.44% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLF and PFIX have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOLF has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to PFIX (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs PFIX's -36.17%.
GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOLF and PFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer