GOLDX vs. PCLIX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GOLDX (Gabelli Gold Fund) and PCLIX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - GOLDX is a Gold fund actively managed by Gabelli, while PCLIX is a Commodities fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX returned 10.57%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for PCLIX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLDX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PCLIX.

Performance

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a -13.44% return, which is significantly lower than PCLIX's 32.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has underperformed PCLIX with an annualized return of 10.57%, while PCLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.

GOLDX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -14.86%
• 6M: -21.02%
• YTD: -13.44%
• 1Y: 50.16%
• 3Y*: 37.34%
• 5Y*: 19.60%
• 10Y*: 10.57%

PCLIX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 4.57%
• 6M: 28.11%
• YTD: 32.22%
• 1Y: 36.64%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: 15.47%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GOLDX Gabelli Gold Fund	-13.44%	165.59%	14.92%	7.85%	-11.02%	-8.97%	26.30%	43.94%	-14.80%	6.22%
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	32.22%	5.76%	8.53%	0.69%	23.32%	43.83%	-9.18%	19.37%	-12.02%	10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and PCLIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010	0.30

The correlation between GOLDX and PCLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX

GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 23
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

PCLIX

PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 62
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOLDX	PCLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.91	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	2.53	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	2.42	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.07	8.41	-5.34

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, which is greater than PCLIX's maximum drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and PCLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOLDX	PCLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.40%	-66.60%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.54%	-15.39%	-22.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.54%	-15.39%	-22.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.73%	-21.59%	-23.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.42%	-51.78%	+2.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.56%	-7.90%	-28.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-24.05%	-10.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.24%	4.40%	+11.84%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) at 5.57%. This indicates that GOLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOLDX	PCLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.11%	5.57%	+8.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.97%	17.54%	+21.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.54%	19.50%	+26.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.41%	19.50%	+13.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.43%	40.50%	-8.07%

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLDX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLIX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOLDX vs. PCLIX - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than PCLIX's 10.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GOLDX Gabelli Gold Fund	17.99%	15.57%	2.11%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%	1.69%	0.83%	0.34%	0.51%	2.18%	0.00%
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	10.54%	2.45%	7.50%	5.06%	42.60%	73.41%	0.77%	2.46%	18.58%	12.63%	0.16%	2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOLDX and PCLIX in my portfolio?

GOLDX and PCLIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOLDX or PCLIX?

GOLDX has higher volatility (14.11%) compared to PCLIX (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLDX dropped -73.40% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.