PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLDX vs. OCMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than OCMGX's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has underperformed OCMGX with an annualized return of 14.52%, while OCMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.45% annualized return.


GOLDX

1D
-3.08%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
1.07%
6M
8.57%
1Y
68.25%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
14.52%

OCMGX

1D
-2.35%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.60%
6M
17.18%
1Y
71.97%
3Y*
51.52%
5Y*
20.11%
10Y*
17.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
1.07%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%
OCMGX
OCM Gold Fund
7.60%167.05%23.15%4.21%-17.71%-9.67%44.28%56.74%-13.84%9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and OCMGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.93

The correlation between GOLDX and OCMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. OCMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

OCMGX
OCMGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
OCMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OCMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLDXOCMGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.09

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.42

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.02

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.58

8.52

-1.95

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the OCMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and OCMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLDXOCMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.09

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.59

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.12

+0.11

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, smaller than the maximum OCMGX drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and OCMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDXOCMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-84.47%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.96%

-27.33%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.96%

-27.33%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.73%

-45.55%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-45.55%

-3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

-17.95%

-7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-41.16%

+6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.79%

9.67%

+2.12%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) have volatilities of 14.29% and 13.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDXOCMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

13.64%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

31.59%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.68%

38.82%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

34.33%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.26%

33.85%

-1.59%

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLDX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is lower than OCMGX's 2.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLDX vs. OCMGX - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than OCMGX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.41%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%0.00%
OCMGX
OCM Gold Fund
6.04%6.50%2.88%0.00%0.05%1.07%0.98%6.33%26.98%7.19%19.53%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GOLDX and OCMGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOLDX has higher volatility (14.29%) compared to OCMGX (13.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLDX dropped -73.40% vs OCMGX's -84.47%.

OCMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLDX and OCMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer