GOIIX vs. COTZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GOIIX (Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio) and COTZX (Columbia Thermostat Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GOIIX returned 8.75%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for COTZX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GOIIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for COTZX.

Performance

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOIIX achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's 3.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GOIIX has outperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.

GOIIX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 8.46%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: 8.75%

COTZX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: 7.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio	7.78%	15.03%	14.81%	15.16%	-15.86%	12.65%	12.73%	19.16%	-8.63%	16.60%
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	3.49%	15.02%	7.98%	11.66%	-12.92%	6.44%	29.61%	15.15%	-1.17%	3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GOIIX and COTZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2002	0.85

The correlation between GOIIX and COTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (5 years) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GOIIX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOIIX

GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

COTZX

COTZX Risk / Return Rank: 78
COTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
COTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
COTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
COTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
COTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOIIX	COTZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.57	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.82	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.50	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.24	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.67	15.24	-2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the COTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOIIX and COTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOIIX	COTZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.57	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.66	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	1.01	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.64	-0.09

Drawdowns

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOIIX drawdown since its inception was -43.63%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOIIX and COTZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOIIX	COTZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.63%	-47.48%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-4.02%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	-6.93%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.78%	-17.80%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.07%	-17.80%	-7.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.41%	-3.47%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	0.85%	+0.77%

Volatility

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 1.60%. This indicates that GOIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOIIX	COTZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	1.60%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.99%	3.96%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.69%	5.06%	+3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.65%	7.33%	+3.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.27%	7.39%	+3.88%

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOIIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GOIIX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison

GOIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than COTZX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	3.25%	3.37%	3.55%	2.74%	3.28%	14.82%	6.92%	5.57%	4.45%	3.13%	2.66%	4.26%
GOIIX Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio	7.96%	7.98%	9.79%	1.97%	5.09%	6.80%	3.47%	2.29%	3.04%	2.73%	1.37%	3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOIIX and COTZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GOIIX and COTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GOIIX or COTZX?

GOIIX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to COTZX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOIIX dropped -43.63% vs COTZX's -47.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.